CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status / 245(k)
APPLICANT: Filipino Speech Language Pathologist
LOCATION: North Dakota
Our client has a current employer that was willing to petition him for a second-preference I-140. Our client has a master’s degree in speech language pathology, a valid North Dakota speech language pathologist license, and has worked for his current employer since August 2015. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that he is clearly eligible for EB-2 classification for his I-140 petition. Our client eventually retained us in March 2017.
Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed. After we obtained the PW determination, our office filed the job order on June 20, 2017. On December 13, 2017, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on April 26, 2018, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Filipino beneficiary.
We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing. We submitted the “ability to pay” letter for the I-140 petition application. We included the job offer letter, employer’s tax records, and other necessary supporting documents. The I-140 Petition was filed on July 26, 2018 via premium processing service.
However, on August 6, 2018, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center issued Request for Evidence (RFE) and requested our client to submit the documents to show special skills for Beneficiary. On September 5, 2018, our office filed Response to RFE and included the letter from the Petitioner regarding the proof that Beneficiary already obtained his special skills for the proffered position. Eventually, on September 14, 2018, the I-140 EB2 Petition for our Filipino client was approved.
Once his I-140 petition was approved, he retained our office again and determined to file an adjustment of status application for him and his immediate family members. However, our office was informed that our client’s DS-2019 was not extended by his employer and he has continuously worked for his employer without the DHS’ authorization. Thus, he worked without authorization and overstayed his visa status.
Section 245(k) of the Immigration and Nationality Act can render the normal bars to adjustment of status found in section 245(c)(2), (c)(7), and (c)(8) inapplicable to certain employment-based adjustment of status applicants who, since their last lawful admission to the United States have not, for an aggregate period of more than 180 days:
- Failed to maintain, continuously, a lawful status;
- Engaged in unauthorized employment; or
- Otherwise violated the terms and conditions of his or her admission
INA §245(k).
An eligible derivative of an alien may benefit from section 245(k) in his or her own right if he or she has failed to maintain continuously a lawful status, worked without authorization, or otherwise violated the terms and conditions of his or her admission for an aggregate of 180 days or less pursuant to a lawful admission.
(See page 2, Neufeld Memorandum July 14, 2008, “Applicability of section 245(k) to Certain Employment-Based Adjustment of Status Applications filed under Section 245(a).
At least, our client has not accrued over 180 days of “failure to maintain lawful status” nor over 180 days of “unauthorized employment”, and as such, he was still eligible to adjust status based on the I-485 filing through INA 245(k).
On December 21, 2018, our office filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client and his immediate family members. Our office also submitted a detailed cover brief and explained why our client is still eligible for the adjustment of status through 245K subsection despite his overstay and unauthorized employment. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.
Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client via conference calls as well. On November 6, 2019, our client was interviewed at Minneapolis, Minnesota USCIS office. Attorney Sung Hee (Glen) Yu from our office also accompanied our clients. Though interview was thoroughly held, on November 8, 2019, their I-485 applications were approved by the USCIS.